翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Board of Control for Lunacy and Mental Deficiency
・ Board of Deputies of British Jews
・ Board of directors
・ Board of Ecclesiastical Commissioners
・ Board of Economic Warfare
・ Board of Editors in the Life Sciences
・ Board of education
・ Board of Education Act 1899
・ Board of Education Building
・ Board of Education Building (Philadelphia)
・ Board of Education for the City of York
・ Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
・ Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell
・ Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
・ Board of Education v. Earls
Board of Education v. Walters
・ Board of Equalization
・ Board of estimate
・ Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris
・ Board of European Students of Technology
・ Board of Examinations
・ Board of Extension of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South
・ Board of Finance
・ Board of First Fruits
・ Board of Fortifications
・ Board of governors
・ Board of Governors of the BBC
・ Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency
・ Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service
・ Board of Governors, FRS v. Investment Co. Institute


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Board of Education v. Walters : ウィキペディア英語版
Board of Education v. Walters

''Board of Education v. Walters'' was an Ohio Supreme Court case in 1979 relating to the funding of primary and secondary schools in Ohio. The Court ruled that the method of funding public schools at the time was constitutional despite disparities in per-pupil education spending between different districts. Article VI of the Ohio Constitution states that the state must provide an "adequate system of public schools." The ruling overturned a previous trial court ruling that stated that the system of funding violated the Constitution of Ohio's requirement of providing a thorough and efficient system of public education. ''Board of Education v. Walters'' is considered one of the cases that played a role leading up to ''DeRolph v. State of Ohio'' in 1997, which eventually ruled that the model of funding for public schools in Ohio was unconstitutional.
==Background==

The plaintiffs of this case brought a lawsuit to the court declaring that Ohio held the responsibility to fund its public schools. The school board of Cincinnati had filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Ohio school districts that believed they were underfunded. The plaintiffs believed that the system of funding, a mixture of state and local funding, violated the constitutional requirement to provide enough educational funding to operate a school district. Furthermore, they argued that forcing a school district to adequately fund their district violated the education provisions of the Constitution of Ohio. At the trial court level, the method of funding for public schools was deemed unconstitutional. However, on appeal, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed the decision and upheld the constitutionality of the school funding method.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Board of Education v. Walters」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.